It is a basic, ancient and mysterious issue: why our space is three dimensional? This issue is related to philosophy, mathematics, physics and even religion, and thus aroused great research interests. The author makes an in-depth analysis of the problem, and finally comes to a conclusion: For any vector space with symmetry, orthogonality, homogeneity and completeness, the space dimension must be three on condition that: the energy obeys the law of conservation, the dynamics law is governed by the covariance principle, and thus the cross-product must can be defined in the space. Our space just meets and requires the above constraints, so its dimension is three.
Published in | American Journal of Modern Physics (Volume 6, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12 |
Page(s) | 122-126 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Space-time, Dimension, Energy Conservation Law, Covariance Principle, Field Tensor, Cross-product
[1] | Rynasiewicz, Robert, "Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Stanford University). |
[2] | Schutz, Bernard, Gravity from the Ground Up: An Introductory Guide to Gravity and General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, 2004). |
[3] | WS Massey, "Cross products of vectors in higher dimensional Euclidean spaces", The American Mathematical Monthly. 90 (10): 697–701. (1983). |
[4] | Rolfsen, Dale, Knots and Links (Berkeley, California: Publish or Perish, 1976). |
[5] | N Mankoc Borstnik and H B Nielsen, Why Nature has made a choice of one time and three space coordinates? Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 2002, Vol. 35, no 49. |
[6] | Y Itin, FW Hehl, Is the Lorentz signature of the metric of spacetime electromagnetic in origin? Annals of Physics, 2004, 312(1): 60-83. |
[7] | D Kothawala, Minimal Length and Small Scale Structure of Spacetime, Physical Review D, 2013, 88(10): 130-130. |
[8] | T Padmanabhan, S Chakraborty and D Kothawala, Spacetime with zero point length is two-dimensional at the Planck scale, General Relativity & Gravitation, 2016, 48(5): 1-8. |
[9] | David J Griffiths, Introduction to electrodynamics (Prentice Hall, 3rd ed., pp. 559–562, 1999). |
[10] | Landau LD and Lifshitz EM, Mechanics (Pergamon Press, 3rd ed., pp. 2–4, 1976). |
[11] | Griffiths, David J., Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (Prentice Hall, 2nd ed., 2004). |
[12] | Arnold, V. I., Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer, 1989). |
[13] | Ashby, Neil, Relativity and the Global Positioning System, Physics Today, 55 (5): 41–47(2002). |
[14] | E. J. Post, Formal Structure of Electromagnetics: General Covariance and Electromagnetics (Dover publications). |
[15] | M. R. Spiegel, S. Lipschutz, D. Spellman, Vector Analysis (USA: McGraw Hill., Schaum’s Outlines, 2nd ed., 2009). |
[16] | John Lee, Introduction to smooth manifolds (Springer, p. 173, 2000). |
[17] | Danielson, Donald A, Vectors and Tensors in Engineering and Physics (Westview (Perseus), 2nd ed., 2003). |
APA Style
Hua Ma. (2017). A Physical Explanation on Why Our Space Is Three Dimensional. American Journal of Modern Physics, 6(6), 122-126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12
ACS Style
Hua Ma. A Physical Explanation on Why Our Space Is Three Dimensional. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2017, 6(6), 122-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12
AMA Style
Hua Ma. A Physical Explanation on Why Our Space Is Three Dimensional. Am J Mod Phys. 2017;6(6):122-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12, author = {Hua Ma}, title = {A Physical Explanation on Why Our Space Is Three Dimensional}, journal = {American Journal of Modern Physics}, volume = {6}, number = {6}, pages = {122-126}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.20170606.12}, abstract = {It is a basic, ancient and mysterious issue: why our space is three dimensional? This issue is related to philosophy, mathematics, physics and even religion, and thus aroused great research interests. The author makes an in-depth analysis of the problem, and finally comes to a conclusion: For any vector space with symmetry, orthogonality, homogeneity and completeness, the space dimension must be three on condition that: the energy obeys the law of conservation, the dynamics law is governed by the covariance principle, and thus the cross-product must can be defined in the space. Our space just meets and requires the above constraints, so its dimension is three.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Physical Explanation on Why Our Space Is Three Dimensional AU - Hua Ma Y1 - 2017/09/21 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12 T2 - American Journal of Modern Physics JF - American Journal of Modern Physics JO - American Journal of Modern Physics SP - 122 EP - 126 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-8891 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20170606.12 AB - It is a basic, ancient and mysterious issue: why our space is three dimensional? This issue is related to philosophy, mathematics, physics and even religion, and thus aroused great research interests. The author makes an in-depth analysis of the problem, and finally comes to a conclusion: For any vector space with symmetry, orthogonality, homogeneity and completeness, the space dimension must be three on condition that: the energy obeys the law of conservation, the dynamics law is governed by the covariance principle, and thus the cross-product must can be defined in the space. Our space just meets and requires the above constraints, so its dimension is three. VL - 6 IS - 6 ER -