Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model

Alessandra Simonelli; Francesca De Palo; Micol Parolin; Marilena Moretti

doi:doi:10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model

Alessandra Simonelli, Francesca De Palo, Micol Parolin, Marilena Moretti

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 2)

Received: 5 March 2014 Accepted: 8 April 2014 Published: 10 May 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The Strange Situation Procedure (SSP; Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978) is the most widely used procedure to assess attachment in early childhood (Bowlby, 1969). In the original text by Ainsworth et al. (1978), the video coding is carried out by means of a two-step procedure: in the first part, coders apply a series of observational scales with graduated scores on a Likert scale, whereas during the second part, a descriptive category of attachment is assigned, which somehow “summarizes” the general quality of the child’s behaviour, already assessed by means of scales. Obviously, the system validation study highlights a discriminant correspondence between the scores which are assigned through the scales and the descriptive category which is assigned in the end. The aim of the present study was to test this specific aspect of the Strange Situation coding procedure: in order to do so, and similarly to what had been done in the original work in 1978, we compared the categorical attachment classification system with the ordinal one provided by the scales, which describe the child’s behaviors in the various procedure episodes. 76 12-month-old infants were observed in the Strange Situation Procedure in order to compare the classification of attachment by the global descriptive patterns with the Ainsworth’s microanalytic coding system (Interactive Behavior Scales). Results: Discriminant function analysis (MDFA) and classification weights confirm the discriminant functions of the interactive behavior to differentiate between patterns of attachment and attesting good validity of the methodology and the coding system.

Published in	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
Page(s)	75-84
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Strange Situation Procedure, Interactive Behavior Scales, Discriminant Analysis, Patterns of Attachment

References

[1]	Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1985). Patterns of infant-mother attachment: antecedents and effects on development. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 61, 771-791
[2]	Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., Stayton, D. J. (1971). Infant-mother attachment and social development: socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In M. P. M. Richards (Eds), The integration of a child into a social world, Cambridge University Press, London, 99-135
[3]	Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M., Waters, E., Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
[4]	Ainsworth, M. D. S, Wittig B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behavior of one-year-olds in a strange-situation. In B. M. Foss (Eds), Determinants of infant behavior IV, Methuen, London, 113-136
[5]	Barbaranelli C. (2006). Analisi dei dati con SPSS. Le analisi multivariate. LED, Edizioni Universitarie
[6]	Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J., Ijzendoorn M H. van (1993). A psychometric study of the Adult Attachment Interview-reliability and discriminant validity. Developmental Psychology, 29, 870-879
[7]	Belsky, J., Rovine, M., Taylor, D. G. (1984). The Pennsylvania Infant and Family Development Project, III. The origins of individual differences in infant-mother attachment: Maternal and infant contributions. Child Development, 55, 718-728
[8]	Belsky J., Isabella R. A. (1991). Interactional synchrony and the origins of infant-mother attachment: a replication study. Child Development , 62, 373-384
[9]	Benoit D., Parker K. C. H. (1994). Stability and Trasmission of Attachment across three Generations. Child Development, 65, 1444-1457
[10]	Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1, Attachment, Hogarth Press, London
[11]	Bowlby J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2, Separation, anxiety and anger, Hogarth Press, London
[12]	Bowlby J. (1980). Attachment and loss, vol. 3, Loss, sadness and depression, Hogarth Press, London
[13]	De Wolff M. S., Ijzendoorn M. H. Van (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: a meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infants attachment, Child Development, 68, 571-591
[14]	Goldsmith H. H., Alansky J. A. (1987). Maternal and infant predictors of attachment: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 55, 805-816
[15]	Isabella R. A. (1993). Origins of attachment: maternal interactive behavior across the first year. Child Development, 64, 605-621
[16]	Main M., Solomon J. (1986). Discovery of a new, insecure-disorganized-disoriented attachment pattern. In: Brazelton T.B., Yogman M. (Eds) Affective development in infancy. Ablex, Norwood
[17]	Main M., Solomon J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized-disoriented during Ainsworth Strange Situation. In: Greenberg M. T., Cicchetti A., Cummings M. E. (Eds) Attachment in the preschool years. Theory, research and intervention. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
[18]	Main, M., Weston, D. (1981). Quality of attachment to mother and to father: related to conflict behaviour and the readiness for establishing new relationships, Child Development, 52, 932-940
[19]	Meins E. (1997). Security of Attachment and the Social Development of Cognition, Psychology Press, Hove
[20]	Schneider-Rosen K., Rothbaum P. (1993). Quality of Parental Caregiving and Security of Attachment, Developmental Psychology, 29, 358 – 367
[21]	Seifer R., Shiller M., Sameroff A. J., Resnik S., Riordan K., (1996). Attachment, maternal sensitivity and infant temperament during the first year of life, Developmental Psychology, 32, 1, 12-25
[22]	Simonelli A., De Palo F., Moretti M., Merlin Baratter P., Porreca A. (2014). The Strange Situation Procedure: the role of the attachment patterns in the italian culture, American Journal of Applied Psychology, in press
[23]	Smith, P. B., Pederson, D. R. (1988). Maternal sensitivity and pat-terns of infant-mother attachment. Child Development, 59, 4, 1097-1101
[24]	Solomon J., George C. (2002). Attaccamento e accudimento: il sistema comportamentale di accudimento. In J. Cassidy, P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Ma-nuale dell’attaccamento. Roma, Fioriti Editore, 737-760
[25]	Thompson R. A. (2002). Attaccamento infantile e sviluppo successivo. In J. Cassidy, P. R. Shaver (Eds), Manuale dell’attaccamento, Fioriti Editore, Roma, 807-830
[26]	Van Ijzendoorn M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg M. (2005). Sensibilità materna e temperamento infantile nella formazione del legame di attaccamento. In Cassibba R., van IJzendoorn M. H. (Eds), L’intervento basato sull’attaccamento, Il Mulino: Bologna
[27]	Van Ijzendoorn M. H., Dijkstra J., Bus A. G. (1995). Attach-ment, intelligence and language: a meta-analysis, Social Development, 4, 115-128
[28]	Van Ijzendoorn M. H., Goldberg S., Kroonenberg P. M., Frenkel O. J. (1992). The relative effects of maternal and child problems on the quality of attachment: a meta-analysis of attachment in clinical samples, Child Development , 63, 840-858
[29]	Van Ijzendoorn M. H., Sagi A. (2002). Modelli trans-culturali di attaccamento: dimensioni un-iversali e contestuali. In Cassidy J., Shaver P. R., Manuale dell’attaccamento, Fioriti Editore, Roma, 807-830
[30]	Waters E. (1979). The reliability and Stability of Individual Differences in Infant-Mother Attach-ment, Child Development, 49, 971-5
[31]	Weinfield N. S., Sroufe A., Egeland B., Carlson E. A. (2002). La natura delle differenze individuali nell’attaccamento del bambino al caregiver. In J. Cassidy, P. R. Shaver, Manuale dell’attaccamento, Fioriti Editore, Roma, 78-100.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alessandra Simonelli, Francesca De Palo, Micol Parolin, Marilena Moretti. (2014). Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 3(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alessandra Simonelli; Francesca De Palo; Micol Parolin; Marilena Moretti. Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2014, 3(2), 75-84. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alessandra Simonelli, Francesca De Palo, Micol Parolin, Marilena Moretti. Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model. Psychol Behav Sci. 2014;3(2):75-84. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17,
  author = {Alessandra Simonelli and Francesca De Palo and Micol Parolin and Marilena Moretti},
  title = {Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model},
  journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {75-84},
  doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20140302.17},
  abstract = {The Strange Situation Procedure (SSP; Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978) is the most widely used procedure to assess attachment in early childhood (Bowlby, 1969). In the original text by Ainsworth et al. (1978), the video coding is carried out by means of a two-step procedure: in the first part, coders apply a series of observational scales with graduated scores on a Likert scale, whereas during the second part, a descriptive category of attachment is assigned, which somehow “summarizes” the general quality of the child’s behaviour, already assessed by means of scales. Obviously, the system validation study highlights a discriminant correspondence between the scores which are assigned through the scales and the descriptive category which is assigned in the end. The aim of the present study was to test this specific aspect of the Strange Situation coding procedure: in order to do so, and similarly to what had been done in the original work in 1978, we compared the categorical attachment classification system with the ordinal one provided by the scales, which describe the child’s behaviors in the various procedure episodes. 76 12-month-old infants were observed in the Strange Situation Procedure in order to compare the classification of attachment by the global descriptive patterns with the Ainsworth’s microanalytic coding system (Interactive Behavior Scales). Results: Discriminant function analysis (MDFA) and classification weights confirm the discriminant functions of the interactive behavior to differentiate between patterns of attachment and attesting good validity of the methodology and the coding system.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model
AU  - Alessandra Simonelli
AU  - Francesca De Palo
AU  - Micol Parolin
AU  - Marilena Moretti
Y1  - 2014/05/10
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
SP  - 75
EP  - 84
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
AB  - The Strange Situation Procedure (SSP; Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978) is the most widely used procedure to assess attachment in early childhood (Bowlby, 1969). In the original text by Ainsworth et al. (1978), the video coding is carried out by means of a two-step procedure: in the first part, coders apply a series of observational scales with graduated scores on a Likert scale, whereas during the second part, a descriptive category of attachment is assigned, which somehow “summarizes” the general quality of the child’s behaviour, already assessed by means of scales. Obviously, the system validation study highlights a discriminant correspondence between the scores which are assigned through the scales and the descriptive category which is assigned in the end. The aim of the present study was to test this specific aspect of the Strange Situation coding procedure: in order to do so, and similarly to what had been done in the original work in 1978, we compared the categorical attachment classification system with the ordinal one provided by the scales, which describe the child’s behaviors in the various procedure episodes. 76 12-month-old infants were observed in the Strange Situation Procedure in order to compare the classification of attachment by the global descriptive patterns with the Ainsworth’s microanalytic coding system (Interactive Behavior Scales). Results: Discriminant function analysis (MDFA) and classification weights confirm the discriminant functions of the interactive behavior to differentiate between patterns of attachment and attesting good validity of the methodology and the coding system.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Alessandra Simonelli

Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
Francesca De Palo

Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
Micol Parolin

Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
Marilena Moretti

Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, Padova, Italy

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alessandra Simonelli, Francesca De Palo, Micol Parolin, Marilena Moretti. (2014). Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 3(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alessandra Simonelli; Francesca De Palo; Micol Parolin; Marilena Moretti. Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2014, 3(2), 75-84. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alessandra Simonelli, Francesca De Palo, Micol Parolin, Marilena Moretti. Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model. Psychol Behav Sci. 2014;3(2):75-84. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17,
  author = {Alessandra Simonelli and Francesca De Palo and Micol Parolin and Marilena Moretti},
  title = {Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model},
  journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {75-84},
  doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20140302.17},
  abstract = {The Strange Situation Procedure (SSP; Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978) is the most widely used procedure to assess attachment in early childhood (Bowlby, 1969). In the original text by Ainsworth et al. (1978), the video coding is carried out by means of a two-step procedure: in the first part, coders apply a series of observational scales with graduated scores on a Likert scale, whereas during the second part, a descriptive category of attachment is assigned, which somehow “summarizes” the general quality of the child’s behaviour, already assessed by means of scales. Obviously, the system validation study highlights a discriminant correspondence between the scores which are assigned through the scales and the descriptive category which is assigned in the end. The aim of the present study was to test this specific aspect of the Strange Situation coding procedure: in order to do so, and similarly to what had been done in the original work in 1978, we compared the categorical attachment classification system with the ordinal one provided by the scales, which describe the child’s behaviors in the various procedure episodes. 76 12-month-old infants were observed in the Strange Situation Procedure in order to compare the classification of attachment by the global descriptive patterns with the Ainsworth’s microanalytic coding system (Interactive Behavior Scales). Results: Discriminant function analysis (MDFA) and classification weights confirm the discriminant functions of the interactive behavior to differentiate between patterns of attachment and attesting good validity of the methodology and the coding system.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Interactive Behaviors and Attachment Patterns in the Strange Situation Procedure: A Validation of the Ainsworth Model
AU  - Alessandra Simonelli
AU  - Francesca De Palo
AU  - Micol Parolin
AU  - Marilena Moretti
Y1  - 2014/05/10
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
SP  - 75
EP  - 84
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140302.17
AB  - The Strange Situation Procedure (SSP; Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, Wall, 1978) is the most widely used procedure to assess attachment in early childhood (Bowlby, 1969). In the original text by Ainsworth et al. (1978), the video coding is carried out by means of a two-step procedure: in the first part, coders apply a series of observational scales with graduated scores on a Likert scale, whereas during the second part, a descriptive category of attachment is assigned, which somehow “summarizes” the general quality of the child’s behaviour, already assessed by means of scales. Obviously, the system validation study highlights a discriminant correspondence between the scores which are assigned through the scales and the descriptive category which is assigned in the end. The aim of the present study was to test this specific aspect of the Strange Situation coding procedure: in order to do so, and similarly to what had been done in the original work in 1978, we compared the categorical attachment classification system with the ordinal one provided by the scales, which describe the child’s behaviors in the various procedure episodes. 76 12-month-old infants were observed in the Strange Situation Procedure in order to compare the classification of attachment by the global descriptive patterns with the Ainsworth’s microanalytic coding system (Interactive Behavior Scales). Results: Discriminant function analysis (MDFA) and classification weights confirm the discriminant functions of the interactive behavior to differentiate between patterns of attachment and attesting good validity of the methodology and the coding system.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download