Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2020, Page: 12-19
The Contemporary Value of Engels’ Dialectics
Kun Wu, School of Humanities and Social science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China; International Center for Philosophy of Information, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
Qiong Nan, School of Humanities and Social science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
Received: Mar. 27, 2020;       Accepted: Apr. 21, 2020;       Published: May 14, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijssam.20200502.11      View  223      Downloads  41
Abstract
This year is of course the 200th anniversary of Engels’ birth (On November 28). On this special year, it is still necessary to carefully sort out the philosophical heritage left to us by this great man and draw on the ideas that can be used for reference. This paper only discusses the contemporary value of certain viewpoints and theories in Engels' Dialectics. In Engels' concept, dialectics is not only the way we perceive the world, it’s also the property of objective nature. In Engels' view, the basic viewpoint of dialectics is to regard all things as the process of eternal change and movement in the interaction of universal relations. Many of the dialectic thoughts put forward by Engels are consistent with the relevant theories of contemporary science. For example, universal differences necessarily generate universal interaction; the interaction inevitably bases on the intermediary; the overall evolution of things is characterized by the eternal cycle of evolution and degeneration which transform into each other constantly; some thoughts contain the view of holography, and so on. The re-excavation of Engels's views and theories will undoubtedly have great practical significance and value in cleaning up and correcting the separation between man and nature, society and nature caused by the prevalence of contemporary philosophy of consciousness, reducing and preventing all kinds of disastrous consequences brought by it, and further promoting the construction process of theory and practice of human ecological civilization and sustainable development strategy.
Keywords
Engels, Dialectics, Interaction, Mediation, Eternal Cycle, Holography
To cite this article
Kun Wu, Qiong Nan, The Contemporary Value of Engels’ Dialectics, International Journal of Systems Science and Applied Mathematics. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2020, pp. 12-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijssam.20200502.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Selected works of Marx and Engels [M]. Beijing:People’s publishing house, 1995 (3): 358, 484, 311, 351, 359; 361, 360, 352; 359, 431; 427, 385, 462-463, 483; 485, 484, 481.
[2]
Engels, Frederick. Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy (Lawrence and Wishart).1947 [1888]: 16.
[3]
Selected works of Marx and Engels [M]. Beijing: People’s publishing house, 1995 (4): 365, 310-311, 243, 284, 244, 215; 216, 228, 216; 217, 244-245, 246, 267, 247, 247, 322-323, 321-323, 327-328, 318, 217, 270-271, 344, 217, 278, 278-279, 310, 311; 313, 348-349, 371-372, 267-268, 383, 320.
[4]
Sartre, Jean-Paul, Critique of Dialectical Reason (Verso), 2004 [1960]: 31.
[5]
Lukács, Georg. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (Merlin Press). 1971 [1923]: 2.
[6]
Rees, John. The Algebra of Revolution: The Dialectic and the Classical Marxist Tradition (Routledge). 1998: 252.
[7]
Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro. Materialist Dialectics and Biophysical Worlds. Science & Society, Vol. 81, No. 3, July 2017: 375–396.
[8]
Engels. Dialectics of nature [M]. Translated by Yu Guangyuan, Beijing: People’s publishing house, 1984: 50, 75-76, 62.
[9]
Lenin. Philosophy Notes [M]. Beijing: people’s publishing house, 1974: 172, 103; 172, 288, 389-390.
[10]
Xiao Qian, Li Xiulin, Wang Yongxiang. Principles of dialectical materialism [M]. Beijing: People's publishing house, 1981: 157.
[11]
Fuchs, Christian. Dialectical materialism and the self-organization of matter. In Towards otherland: Languages of science and languages beyond, edited by Rainer E. Zimmermann and Vladimir G. Budanov, Kassel: Kassel Uni- versity Press. 2005: 59-80.
[12]
Fuchs, Chriatian. Self-organizing system. In Encyclopedia of governance, edited by Mark Bevir, London: Sage. 2007: 863-64.
[13]
Fuchs, Chriatian. Dialektisches Denken als Grundlage der Kritik des transnationalen informationellen Kapitalismus. In Proceedings of the Conference “Polyphone Dialektik,” Berlin, November 1-4, 2007, Vorschein 30: 97-119.
[14]
Selected works of Marx and Engels [M]. Beijing: People's publishing house, 1995 (1): 144.
[15]
Selected works of Lenin [M]. Beijing: People's publishing house, 1972 (2): 711, 712, 40-41; 89.
[16]
The complete works of Marx and Engels [M]. Beijing: People's publishing house, 1971 (20): 673.
[17]
Wu, Kun. The Foundation of Complex Information System Theory; Xi’an Jiaotong University Press: Xi’an, China, 2010.
[18]
Xue Jianwen, Wang Dawen. Systemic dialectics and materialist dialectics [J]. Chinese journal of systems science, 2000 (4): 15-18.
Browse journals by subject